In February of this year, I created a presentation for all LISD faculty and staff. I presented at our February Conference for continuing education. This was both a personal and professional victory for me. I was celebrating the loss of 69 pounds, as well as my joy in being able to share information I found helpful with others. I hope you enjoy the presentation, too.
High Blood Pressure and High Cholesterol
Nurse Nancy
Wednesday, July 4, 2012
Sunday, September 25, 2011
Nurse Nancy Cooks...with Silpat!
So I noticed today, with a slight bit of embarrassment, that the only blogs I link to are cooking blogs. Yes, Nurse Nancy cooks! Cooking is my therapy - sad, happy, can't afford a therapist - let's cook! The methodical act of scooping cookie dough and placing it on a cookie sheet; slicing red potatoes into quarters to roast...it is so soothing.
My awesome hubby bought me a Silpat a couple of weeks ago. A Silpat is a non-stick silicone mat that is reinforced with a fiberglass weave in the middle. The mat fits in a large cookie sheet, and you need not use any fat to grease it. I use it as I would parchment paper - NO broiling, though! The directions that came with the mat made me laugh out loud - reminded me of the Saturday Night Live "Happy Fun Ball" skit: "Warning: Happy Fun Ball may suddenly accelerate to dangerous speeds" and "Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball". There are seven "do nots" or "nevers" on the instructions. I steeled myself and pressed forward with Silpat experimentation.
I discovered that biscuits burn easily on Silpat. I decreased the oven temperature 25 degrees F and cooked for the minimum amount of time for the next round...perfect. Tonight, I compared peanut butter cookies on Silpat vs. parchment. I must say I believe the parchment round came out prettier and more evenly done. The Silpat seemed to encourage the edges of the cookie to splay out and burn prematurely. My family ate both and enjoyed them; they insisted there was no difference in the taste.
My awesome hubby bought me a Silpat a couple of weeks ago. A Silpat is a non-stick silicone mat that is reinforced with a fiberglass weave in the middle. The mat fits in a large cookie sheet, and you need not use any fat to grease it. I use it as I would parchment paper - NO broiling, though! The directions that came with the mat made me laugh out loud - reminded me of the Saturday Night Live "Happy Fun Ball" skit: "Warning: Happy Fun Ball may suddenly accelerate to dangerous speeds" and "Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball". There are seven "do nots" or "nevers" on the instructions. I steeled myself and pressed forward with Silpat experimentation.
I discovered that biscuits burn easily on Silpat. I decreased the oven temperature 25 degrees F and cooked for the minimum amount of time for the next round...perfect. Tonight, I compared peanut butter cookies on Silpat vs. parchment. I must say I believe the parchment round came out prettier and more evenly done. The Silpat seemed to encourage the edges of the cookie to splay out and burn prematurely. My family ate both and enjoyed them; they insisted there was no difference in the taste.
Friday, June 17, 2011
Glad I Decided to go Virtual!
I've often seen the confused, scared look on a patient's face as they leave the clinic or hospital with a new diagnosis. They wonder, "What is atrial fibrillation? How do I manage this? What's my next step? Will I die?"
I find physicians woefully inadequate in the patient education department. Nurses seem better able to meet this need, and are able to work it in as part of patient care. For example, when a nurse enters the hospital room to give a bed bath or hang an IV medication, we can provide patient teaching that is diagnosis and situation-specific, as well as tailored to fit the amount of time we have and the patient's attention span.
The following article details how physicians can use the internet to enhance their practice. Of course, nurses can too.
http://www.linkedin.com/news?actionBar=&articleID=543134156&ids=0QdzgTej8UczkIcjsNc3ARczgRb3oRcjgPcjcQdiMPejgUe3cPd3kIcPgVcjARcjgR&aag=true&freq=weekly&trk=eml-tod-b-ttle-14
I find physicians woefully inadequate in the patient education department. Nurses seem better able to meet this need, and are able to work it in as part of patient care. For example, when a nurse enters the hospital room to give a bed bath or hang an IV medication, we can provide patient teaching that is diagnosis and situation-specific, as well as tailored to fit the amount of time we have and the patient's attention span.
The following article details how physicians can use the internet to enhance their practice. Of course, nurses can too.
http://www.linkedin.com/news?actionBar=&articleID=543134156&ids=0QdzgTej8UczkIcjsNc3ARczgRb3oRcjgPcjcQdiMPejgUe3cPd3kIcPgVcjARcjgR&aag=true&freq=weekly&trk=eml-tod-b-ttle-14
A version of this op-ed was published on January 27th, 2010 in the USA Today.
Raise your hand if you’ve ever left a physician’s office without fully understanding what the doctor just told you.
Studies show that half of patients admit to not understanding what their doctor told them during an office visit; and more than 75% of emergency room patients acknowledge not fully grasping instructions given to them.
As a primary care physician, being unable to clearly communicate with patients is frustrating. The typical, 15-minute office visit often is not sufficient for a thorough discussion of health issues, let alone to clarify any patient confusion. A better way to connect with patients is needed.
Perhaps that is why more patients are turning to the Internet. A recent survey from the Pew Internet & American Life Project estimates that 61% of American adults surf the web for health information, with the majority looking for user-generated content written by others with similar medical conditions.
Social media websites that encourage reader interaction and conversation are playing an increasingly large role in providing information tailored to online patients. There are thousands of blogs and Facebook groups, for instance, where patients discuss their experiences living with cancer, HIV or depression. And patients use Twitter to share tips on battling diabetes, or give advice on finding the right doctor or hospital.
But like a lot of the information on the Internet, not all medical content is credible. In fact, acting on inaccurate web information can be dangerous. That’s where medical professionals can help patients interpret and decipher what is accurate on the web. And with 57 million Americans reading blogs, combined with 120 million monthly U.S. visitors to Facebook and Twitter, social media presents a compelling opportunity for doctors to better interact with patients.
I regularly blog and use other forms of social media; both to provide patients with a physician’s perspective on breaking medical news and to guide readers to reputable sources of medical content. But when you consider that more than two-thirds of doctors don’t even e-mail their patients, it’s probably safe to say I’m in the minority of physicians who use Facebook or Twitter.
One reason deterring more physicians from using the Internet is because professional standards of care are unclear on these platforms. Should physicians diagnose patients who “friend” them on Facebook? Or would a doctor be held liable if he missed a patient who Twittered that he had chest pain? Because few have looked at social media’s impact on patient care, there is little guidance on how physicians can incorporate it into their medical practice.
Dr. Daniel Sands of Harvard Medical School co-wrote a seminal set of guidelines on doctor-patient electronic communication. Sands says that “the only commodity physicians have is time. Doctors don’t want to introduce new technologies of unknown value, which is why something like Twitter is going to take longer to accept.”
Another drawback is that most insurers only pay doctors who talk to patients in the examination room, giving physicians little financial incentive to reach out to patients over the web.
But doctors who are not active online risk being increasingly marginalized. Facebook and Twitter users, half of whom are under of age of 34, rely on the web for most of their information. As this demographic ages, it’s conceivable that they will consult social media first to answer their health questions, rather than schedule an appointment with a doctor.
Already, patients are seeing how social media can improve their care. Hospitals are posting emergency department wait times, as well as updating family members on the status of their loved ones during surgery, on Twitter.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention use their prominent Facebook following to keep the public abreast of dynamically changing events, like the status of the H1N1 influenza pandemic. And doctors can blog and disseminate analysis on breaking medical studies, instantly informing patients of their impact.
Quality health care requires a doctor-patient dialogue that doesn’t simply end once the physician leaves the examining room. While ultimately standards of care online need to be established by professional medical societies, in the meantime doctors should embrace social media as a way to continue the conversation, and to provide patients with the trusted health information they’ll need.
Raise your hand if you’ve ever left a physician’s office without fully understanding what the doctor just told you.
Studies show that half of patients admit to not understanding what their doctor told them during an office visit; and more than 75% of emergency room patients acknowledge not fully grasping instructions given to them.
As a primary care physician, being unable to clearly communicate with patients is frustrating. The typical, 15-minute office visit often is not sufficient for a thorough discussion of health issues, let alone to clarify any patient confusion. A better way to connect with patients is needed.
Perhaps that is why more patients are turning to the Internet. A recent survey from the Pew Internet & American Life Project estimates that 61% of American adults surf the web for health information, with the majority looking for user-generated content written by others with similar medical conditions.
Social media websites that encourage reader interaction and conversation are playing an increasingly large role in providing information tailored to online patients. There are thousands of blogs and Facebook groups, for instance, where patients discuss their experiences living with cancer, HIV or depression. And patients use Twitter to share tips on battling diabetes, or give advice on finding the right doctor or hospital.
But like a lot of the information on the Internet, not all medical content is credible. In fact, acting on inaccurate web information can be dangerous. That’s where medical professionals can help patients interpret and decipher what is accurate on the web. And with 57 million Americans reading blogs, combined with 120 million monthly U.S. visitors to Facebook and Twitter, social media presents a compelling opportunity for doctors to better interact with patients.
I regularly blog and use other forms of social media; both to provide patients with a physician’s perspective on breaking medical news and to guide readers to reputable sources of medical content. But when you consider that more than two-thirds of doctors don’t even e-mail their patients, it’s probably safe to say I’m in the minority of physicians who use Facebook or Twitter.
One reason deterring more physicians from using the Internet is because professional standards of care are unclear on these platforms. Should physicians diagnose patients who “friend” them on Facebook? Or would a doctor be held liable if he missed a patient who Twittered that he had chest pain? Because few have looked at social media’s impact on patient care, there is little guidance on how physicians can incorporate it into their medical practice.
Dr. Daniel Sands of Harvard Medical School co-wrote a seminal set of guidelines on doctor-patient electronic communication. Sands says that “the only commodity physicians have is time. Doctors don’t want to introduce new technologies of unknown value, which is why something like Twitter is going to take longer to accept.”
Another drawback is that most insurers only pay doctors who talk to patients in the examination room, giving physicians little financial incentive to reach out to patients over the web.
But doctors who are not active online risk being increasingly marginalized. Facebook and Twitter users, half of whom are under of age of 34, rely on the web for most of their information. As this demographic ages, it’s conceivable that they will consult social media first to answer their health questions, rather than schedule an appointment with a doctor.
Already, patients are seeing how social media can improve their care. Hospitals are posting emergency department wait times, as well as updating family members on the status of their loved ones during surgery, on Twitter.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention use their prominent Facebook following to keep the public abreast of dynamically changing events, like the status of the H1N1 influenza pandemic. And doctors can blog and disseminate analysis on breaking medical studies, instantly informing patients of their impact.
Quality health care requires a doctor-patient dialogue that doesn’t simply end once the physician leaves the examining room. While ultimately standards of care online need to be established by professional medical societies, in the meantime doctors should embrace social media as a way to continue the conversation, and to provide patients with the trusted health information they’ll need.
Excellent Health Prevention Article
I have always maintained that active prevention behaviors could contribute to decreasing healthcare costs. Nurses are an excellent means to that end: patient education is second-nature to most nurses. It is up to nurses to help define our roles in this process on national and local levels.
http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/Columns/2011/May/052411thorpelever.aspx
Prevention: The Answer To Curbing Chronically High Health Care Costs (Guest Opinion)

http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/Columns/2011/May/052411thorpelever.aspx
Prevention: The Answer To Curbing Chronically High Health Care Costs (Guest Opinion)

Kenneth Thorpe, Ph.D., and Jonathan Lever, Executive director of the Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease and vice president for health strategy and innovation at the YMCA of the USA
May 24, 2011While Congress tries to control health care spending, lawmakers should be careful to make choices that are pennywise but not pound foolish.
In April, the House voted 236 to 183 to repeal the health law's prevention and public health trust fund. Republicans said they opposed giving the Secretary of Health and Human Services wide discretion on how to spend this money. But the result is a setback for the first dedicated source of funding for national prevention efforts and could be a missed opportunity to reduce spending even further by preventing the largest driver of health care costs -- chronic disease.
Largely preventable and highly manageable chronic diseases account for 75 cents of every dollar we spend on health care in the U.S. In contrast, we spend less than 5 cents on prevention, even though the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have estimated that 80 percent of heart disease and type-2 diabetes, and 40 percent of cancers, could be prevented by doing three things: exercising more, eating better and avoiding tobacco.
Yet, we are headed in the other direction. One in five adults still smoke and one in two adults -- and a tragically large number of children -- are overweight or obese. Without a dramatic change, a third of American adults will have diabetes by 2050 (up from 1 in 10 today). Obesity already accounts for 10 to 20 percent of the rise in health care spending and obese adults cost 35 percent more than their normal-weight counterparts because of their risks for diabetes, high blood pressure and other related chronic conditions.
The status quo is expensive, but our future on the current course is unsustainable.
The silver lining is that we have evidence that we can prevent the onset and progression of diseases, including diabetes. These are exactly the types of efforts that the prevention fund should be used to support.
Case In Point: The YMCA, in facilities throughout the country, is offering a group-based diabetes prevention program modeled after the landmark National Institutes of Health /CDC Diabetes Prevention Program. The NIH initiative proved that, with modest weight loss, it is possible to reduce the risk of developing type 2 diabetes among those with pre-diabetes by nearly 60 percent. So far, the YMCA's effort has been getting similar results, at costs that are dramatically lower than that of the NIH program. And the Y has scaled this program to communities in more than 20 states. Investing in the prevention fund could add the program to even more communities throughout the country.
Given that $1 out of every $10 spent on health care is related to diabetes and that people with diabetes have medical costs 2.3 times higher, preventing diabetes is a bargain. In fact, enrolling at risk adults aged 50 in this type of program could reduce the chance they would develop diabetes from 85 to 65 percent.
The NIH diabetes program is just one of the many evidence-based prevention programs vital to preventing chronic disease and curbing rising health care costs if made available nationally. It exemplifies how prevention works to not only improve health, but also to lower cost. Yes, Congress should be working to reduce costs, but lowering health care costs long-term depends on addressing what drives those costs – diabetes and other chronic diseases. We have to make the investment in the ounce of prevention to realize the pound of cure.
Kenneth Thorpe, Ph.D., is the executive director of the Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease. Jonathan Lever is the vice president for health strategy and innovation at the YMCA of the USA.
In April, the House voted 236 to 183 to repeal the health law's prevention and public health trust fund. Republicans said they opposed giving the Secretary of Health and Human Services wide discretion on how to spend this money. But the result is a setback for the first dedicated source of funding for national prevention efforts and could be a missed opportunity to reduce spending even further by preventing the largest driver of health care costs -- chronic disease.
Largely preventable and highly manageable chronic diseases account for 75 cents of every dollar we spend on health care in the U.S. In contrast, we spend less than 5 cents on prevention, even though the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have estimated that 80 percent of heart disease and type-2 diabetes, and 40 percent of cancers, could be prevented by doing three things: exercising more, eating better and avoiding tobacco.
Yet, we are headed in the other direction. One in five adults still smoke and one in two adults -- and a tragically large number of children -- are overweight or obese. Without a dramatic change, a third of American adults will have diabetes by 2050 (up from 1 in 10 today). Obesity already accounts for 10 to 20 percent of the rise in health care spending and obese adults cost 35 percent more than their normal-weight counterparts because of their risks for diabetes, high blood pressure and other related chronic conditions.
The status quo is expensive, but our future on the current course is unsustainable.
The silver lining is that we have evidence that we can prevent the onset and progression of diseases, including diabetes. These are exactly the types of efforts that the prevention fund should be used to support.
Case In Point: The YMCA, in facilities throughout the country, is offering a group-based diabetes prevention program modeled after the landmark National Institutes of Health /CDC Diabetes Prevention Program. The NIH initiative proved that, with modest weight loss, it is possible to reduce the risk of developing type 2 diabetes among those with pre-diabetes by nearly 60 percent. So far, the YMCA's effort has been getting similar results, at costs that are dramatically lower than that of the NIH program. And the Y has scaled this program to communities in more than 20 states. Investing in the prevention fund could add the program to even more communities throughout the country.
Given that $1 out of every $10 spent on health care is related to diabetes and that people with diabetes have medical costs 2.3 times higher, preventing diabetes is a bargain. In fact, enrolling at risk adults aged 50 in this type of program could reduce the chance they would develop diabetes from 85 to 65 percent.
The NIH diabetes program is just one of the many evidence-based prevention programs vital to preventing chronic disease and curbing rising health care costs if made available nationally. It exemplifies how prevention works to not only improve health, but also to lower cost. Yes, Congress should be working to reduce costs, but lowering health care costs long-term depends on addressing what drives those costs – diabetes and other chronic diseases. We have to make the investment in the ounce of prevention to realize the pound of cure.
Kenneth Thorpe, Ph.D., is the executive director of the Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease. Jonathan Lever is the vice president for health strategy and innovation at the YMCA of the USA.
Sunday, April 3, 2011
Cholesterol Basics - Treating High Cholesterol
So your healthcare provider has diagnosed you with high cholesterol. What now? Here are some ways to lower your cholesterol:
- Lose weight/eat a healthy diet: your body is capable of producing cholesterol. Outside, or exogenous, sources of cholesterol increase the amount of cholesterol in your body.
- Exercise: exercise increases HDL, or good cholesterol. HDL is the truant officer of cholesterol: it takes bad cholesterol (LDL) back to the liver.
- If you are diabetic, keep your blood sugar within normal limits. This minimizes the damage to the inner walls of your body's vessels. Less damage means fewer areas for cholesterol to easily attach and harden.
- Don't smoke. Smoking increases the chance for atherosclerosis, or hardening of the arteries.
- Medicine: your healthcare provider may prescibe a daily cholesterol-lowering medication. The most common of these medicine are referred to as "statins". Examples of these medicines include simvastatin (Zocor) and atorvastatin (Lipitor). Statins help slow down the liver's production of cholesterol, while improving the liver's ability to remove LDL cholesterol already present in the body. Liver function tests are performed to make sure your body is tolerating the medicine well. You should notify your healthcare provider immediately if you have unexplained muscle aches or tenderness, dark-colored urine, or fever/flu-like symptoms.
Sunday, March 20, 2011
Cholesterol Basics Part Deux
There are four basic types of cholesterol commonly listed on a fasting lipid profile.
- Total cholesterol: this is the total amount of cholesterol in your blood. This number alone is meaningless without a breakdown of the other cholesterol types.
- HDL (high density lipoprotein): this is good cholesterol. Think of it as a truant officer; HDL picks up extra cholesterol from the body's tissue and takes it to the liver for disposal. Exercise increases HDL levels.
- LDL (low density lipoprotein): this is bad cholesterol. Deposits extra cholesterol in vessel walls, thereby contributing to hardening of the arteries and heart disease.
- Triglycerides: the major form of circulating fat found in the body. The function of triglycerides is to provide energy for cells. These levels increase directly after a meal, which is why a lipid profile should only be drawn on a fasting patient.
Friday, March 18, 2011
Cholesterol Basics
Cholesterol is a waxy, fatty substance that is found in your body and many foods. Your body is capable of making all the cholesterol you need. In fact, the body requires cholesterol to function properly.
If you consume too much cholesterol, your body will collect and deposit cholesterol. When cholesterol accumulates in your vessels, it creates "plaque". These plaque deposits cause narrowing and hardening of the vessels. This narrowing restricts blood flow, and in the case of restricted blood flow to the heart, chest pain. If the vessel is completely blocked, a heart attack occurs.

What can you do to lower your cholesterol levels?
If you consume too much cholesterol, your body will collect and deposit cholesterol. When cholesterol accumulates in your vessels, it creates "plaque". These plaque deposits cause narrowing and hardening of the vessels. This narrowing restricts blood flow, and in the case of restricted blood flow to the heart, chest pain. If the vessel is completely blocked, a heart attack occurs.

What are risk factors for high cholesterol?
- The trump card is genetics. If you have family members with high cholesterol, you may be genetically predisposed to high cholesterol as well.
- Age, weight, diet and physical activity levels are also risk factors.
- Diabetes. High blood sugar levels can cause damage to the inner lining of the body's vessels. This damage creates an easy foothold for plaque to attach.
- Talk with your healthcare provider about testing your fasting cholesterol levels. You and your provider can discuss different treatment options, such as medication and lifestyle changes if your test results are not optimal.
- Maintain a healthy diet and weight.
- Increase your physical activity levels.
- Don't smoke.
- If you have diabetes, keep your blood sugar within optimal levels.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)